The last season of True Blood is coming up this summer. I, of course, have some mixed feelings. I have watched this show since the first episode aired. This will be the first time I have followed a show in real time from beginning to end. I assume this will also be said of Boardwalk Empire and Game of Thrones. But not quite yet!
True Blood has seen some serious up’s and down’s over the years. I remember times when I couldn’t get enough, and times when I thought I would pull my hair out with how off-the-rails ridiculous the story became. Nonetheless, I have never stopped watching. No matter where the story went, I was already in love with so many of the characters.
La La will forever be one of the most fabulous representations of a strong, gay character on television. He may be the most endearing person on the show for me, simply because he never loses sight of who he is. I love consistency in a character, and he delivers it.
Bill is definitely my least favorite at this point…which I hope will change in this last season. The writers turned this character from being the number one good guy to the ultimate evil. That being said, I love when writers take risks. I love it when they do something utterly unexpected. Thus, I was rooting for the angle. However, there are good bad people and bad bad people. Take Eric for example. I don’t know one person watching the show that has ever fully hated Eric. You can’t! He’s such a complex character. That’s where the writing went wrong on this one. Bill became as simple as can be. He no longer wanted anything but total power via some ancient vampire’s blood. You couldn’t feel for him anymore.
If any episode starts to paint Eric like a bad guy, there is always something that the writers throw in to remind you that he is a victim of several circumstances. I love that. Don’t make it so easy on the viewer. Make them feel real emotion when you kill a bad guy or a good guy. That drives the show!
Either way, I have high hopes for the final season. I will be watching every Sunday at 9:00, religiously. Whether the show crashes and burns or ends on a high note, well, that’s for the writers to decide.
Way to go, guys!
Brian Binder is a junior at Elon University with a Major in Media Arts and Entertainment and Minor in Business Administration. Brian loves to tell stories with the camera whether it be through narrative or documentary filmmaking. With the experience gained through Elondocs, he plans to further his knowledge in cinematography and story construction, and be an all-around student of film. Brian plans to work for a small production company as a director/cinematographer on feature films.
Stefan Fortmann is a junior majoring in Media Arts and Entertainment and minoring in Psychology. He is a “born and bred” South African and came to the US to play tennis. He works with the Elon Athletic Department and the Pendulum as a sports photographer. He would love to work with the African Wildlife one day either through photo or documentary work.
Brad Hinkle is a media arts and entertainment major with a concentration…
View original post 569 more words
“Ideas initially take form as hunches. They don’t come into the world fully realized. The light-bulb moment is greatly overrated.” — Steven Johnson
I recently had the pleasure of listening to “Where Ideas Come From,” a discussion from the Ted Radio Hour on National Public Radio. Matt Ridley, Susan Cain, and Steven Johnson all talk about the process of discovering or creating an idea.
I was enthralled as I listened to these people. But I also instantly noticed the difference between a Ted Talk from television and the Ted Radio Hour.
The sound bites were interspersed almost in a pattern. I slowly became able to predict when another sound bite was being inserted as I heard the narrator deliberately pause to give the bite time to run.
Further, music slowly creeped in beneath the voices. The music grew and became louder as the sound bites of the interviewees got closer to the question: where do ideas come from?
Also, some of the sound bites were overlapped with the narration in a way that would not be featured on television. It just wouldn’t make sense. But on the radio, you can do it because visuals do not accompany what you are hearing.
Take the first talk for example, what most listeners will not notice is that the show is changing between Ridley speaking in the studio and Ridley’s past talks. Visually, this would not make sense. Yet, in radio, it is barely noticeable. Ridley’s voice only slightly changes in quality when he is in studio.
Lastly, the actual topic is very interesting, but I am not sure how many people would watch a television segment or a short video on the matter. There is a lot of talking going on. This, of course, is fine for me. However, the general public does not want strictly talking. They want visual elements.
I believe sometimes certain stories are almost ready-made for the radio. This one in particular was a great example of a story that needs to be told, but needs to be told in a particular medium as well.